Was heißt: sich im Denken orientieren? by Immanuel Kant
Read "Was heißt: sich im Denken orientieren? by Immanuel Kant" Online
This book is available in the public domain. Start reading the digital edition below.
START READING FULL BOOKBook Preview
A short preview of the book’s content is shown below to give you an idea of its style and themes.
So, this isn't a story with characters and a plot. The 'story' here is an intellectual one. In 1780s Germany, a fierce debate was raging between two philosophical heavyweights. On one side, a thinker named Friedrich Jacobi argued that pure reason inevitably leads to nihilism and that we must take a 'leap of faith.' On the other, Moses Mendelssohn championed common-sense reasoning. Kant steps into this fight with his essay, acting as a referee.
The Story
Kant sets up a simple but powerful metaphor: orienting yourself. When you're physically lost, you feel for the difference between your left and right hands. That feeling is a subjective need that helps you use an objective reference point (like the North Star). Kant says thinking works the same way. When our logical reasoning runs out of road—like when we try to grasp infinity or the ultimate foundation of morality—we need something else. We need a 'rational faith,' a feeling for what is right, to orient our thoughts. He argues this isn't blind religious faith, but a necessary compass built into how a rational person thinks about the big questions.
Why You Should Read It
I love this because it shows Kant as a problem-solver, not just a remote genius. He admits reason has limits, which feels honest. His solution—that we have an inner moral compass to guide us—is comforting and empowering. It’s like he’s giving permission to trust that gut feeling when you're philosophically adrift, as long as you've used your reason first. It’s a brilliant, concise piece of mental self-defense.
Final Verdict
This is perfect for curious readers who want a bite-sized piece of classic philosophy without committing to a giant tome like the Critique of Pure Reason. It's also great for anyone interested in the roots of debates about faith, reason, and how we make sense of a confusing world. If you've ever asked 'How do I know what's right when the answers aren't clear?' this 18th-century essay might just have a useful clue.
Legal analysis indicates this work is in the public domain. Feel free to use it for personal or commercial purposes.
Edward Perez
1 year agoI came across this while browsing and the plot twists are genuinely surprising. This story will stay with me.
James Williams
2 months agoBased on the summary, I decided to read it and the flow of the text seems very fluid. Worth every second.
James Flores
1 year agoHonestly, the flow of the text seems very fluid. Don't hesitate to start reading.